centerlogobigAAD logo



 BejewelLed Treasures: The Al Thani Collection


Treasure india 1

Tiger Finial from the Throne of Tippoo Sultan (1750-1799), Mysore India, Circa 1790 Gold inlaid with Diamonds, Rubies and Emeralds -  Image Courtsey | Alex Boyle, AAD

 “The earliest known example of Mughal jade; spectacularly large spinels inscribed with the names of emperors from the Mughal treasuries; a jeweled gold tiger’s head finial from the throne of the famed Tipu Sultan of Mysore and a dazzling brooch inspired by Diaghilev’s Ballet Russes made in Paris 1910 are amoung the treasures on display for the first time in the UK, as part of the V & A’s new exhibition bejewelled Treasures; The Al Thani Collection.”


Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 23.47.39

After an appearance at the Metropolitan Museum of Art last year, and reviewed here on AAD, the Al Thani Collection of Prized Artifacts and Jewellry from Mogul India has made its way to the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. While sponsored by Wartski, whom we like, there was an annoying request / order at the press preview to credit Wartski with every single photograph taken by yours truly at the preview. Well, that won't happen. We love Wartski, but they didn’t take the photos, and they don’t own the copyright, because that is what a credit would imply.

We thought that the Al Thanis were rich, but I guess not as rich as we thought, because it seems that now they are leaning on our friends Wartski to pick up the tab on this show.

I guess even petro dollar Sheiks feel the squeeze when oil drops from $120 a barrel down to $40. Let's be honest here, it's not like the Al Thanis did any of the prospecting themselves. They did at one point in time hit a mother load of oil and natural gas which gave them the money to buy up this treasure trove, however.

Now you understand why this show is here, and why we were annoyed when all we wanted to do was to photograph these objects, and tell you about the marvellous items and the history of some of the objects on view in the exhibition, which include two pieces from the magnificent Throne of Tippoo Sultan; a stunning jewel encrusted tigers head as seen in NYC, and the astonishing Huma Bird (one of three pieces on UK Treasury loan to the exhibition) from the canopy of Tippoo Sultan’s famed Throne.

We are awaiting the promised answers to our questions from the Victoria and Albert PR department as to why we were not allowed to photograph the three Treasury on loan pieces. Do these items not belong to the nation, and therefore the people of the UK? Why no photographs allowed, and what will happen to those who whip in a quick selfie at the show in the course of the next few months? The Treasury loan pieces were the first pieces you see in the ‘Bejewelled Treasures: The Al Thani Collection’ exhibition, and arguably the ‘best’ pieces in the exhibition, which somewhat overshadowed the entrance to the collection, and the items which we were really excited about seeing.

In addition, the Huma Bird being rather poorly positioned in the exhibition, and in essence, taking the spotlight away from Tippoo Sultan’s Magic Box and the Tiger Finial from the Throne of Tippoo Sultan, with both these works essentially being placed underneath the Huma Bird’s behind, in a spotlight lit cabinet. Whomever it was charged with the visual layout of these three extraordinary and exceptional objects, might like to consider moving a few things around, prior to the public opening.

That said, the Bejewelled Treasures: The Al Thani Collection exhibition is a unique and glorious opportunity to see, view and experience some of, if not the most extraordinary and finest pieces of Mogul History in private hands. A once in a lifetime expression of passionate targeted collecting, on view for the benefit of all to appreciate, and learn from, for a £10.00 entrance fee. Very much worth the fee and definitely worth a visit.

With the presence of Christies at the MET’s New York opening reception clearly meaning that they have their eyes on these works, and with an exhibition layout in London being reminiscent of an auction view, this is another writer who hopes the “Tippoo Sultan” works stay together in the current hands of His Excellency Sheikh Hamad bin Abdullah Al-Thani.

Entrance Fee : £10.00

Exhibition Dates : 21 November 2015 – 28 March 2016

Location : Victoria and Albert Museum

Cromwell Rd, London SW7 2RL,

United Kingdom

Open daily from 10:00 to 17:45

Open Friday from 10:00 to 22:00

Treasure india 2Tippoo Sultan's Magic Box, Mysore, India, Circa 1789-1798, Gold, Each of the twenty equilateral faces bears a number in Arabic Used as common factors in Euclidean Geometry Pioneered by the Ancient Greeks - Image Courtesy | Alex Boyle, AAD

 Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 17.50.47 copy Example of early Mughal Jade - Image Courtesy | Alex Boyle, AAD

 Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.02.34Turban Jewellry, Jaipur or Hyderbad 19th Century - Gold and Silver set with Diamonds and with Pendent Spinels, Enamelled on the back - Author's own image

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.03.15Locket Pendant, Mughul India, 17th Century, Gold Inlaid with Rubies and Emeralds - Image Courtesy | Alex Boyle

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.04.08A Ceremonial Sword Circa 1880 - 1910. Hyderbad - Author's own Image

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.03.33The Gold hilt set with Diamonds, Rubies and Emeralds - Author's own Image

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 21.59.41Turban Jewellry, possibly Hyderbad - Gold set with Emeralds and Diamonds - Author's own image

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.00.11A showcase of fiine jewellry in the Exhibition - Author's own image

The Nabha Spinel. Royal Collection Trust Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2015The Nabha Spinel - Royal Collection Trust / © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2015

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 18.09.14 copyNecklace 19th or 20th Century, possibly Hyderbad - Gold set with Diamonds and an Emerald bead, Enamelled on the edges - Image Courtesy | Alex Boyle

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.34.29Necklace possibly circa 1900, probably Hyderbad - Gold and Silver set with foiled Emeralds and Diamonds, the chord ends wrapped with Natural Pearls - Image Courtesy | Alex Boyle

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 22.37.42Sapphire and Diamond Turban ornament (sarpech), India, ca.1920; modified ca.1925 - 35 - Image Courtesy | Alex Boyle

 Tiger one miniTiger Finial from the Throne of Tippoo Sultan (1750-1799), Mysore India, Circa 1790 Gold inlaid with Diamonds, Rubies and Emeralds

Screen Shot 2015 11 21 at 23.02.28Huma Bird  - Royal Collection Trust / © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2015

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 17.21.31Front view of the Throne of Tippoo Sultan, text by Benjamin Sydenham, drawings by Thomas Marriott - Wikipedia

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 17.21.44 copyTop View - The Throne of Tippoo Sultan

Screen Shot 2015 11 21 at 19.45.30Tippoo

Screen Shot 2015 11 19 at 23.47.39

You may also like to read:

* Bahrain’s “Renaissance Man” Rashid Al Khalifa

* Purple Prose : Abu Dhabi Art Fair / Art Fairs In General

* Ancestral Arabia :: Assyrian Culture at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

* Treasures From India Jewels From The Al-Thani Collection, Metropolitan Museum Of Art

* Northrop Grumman Rules the Nest, Blackest of Birds Finally Appears in HD

* Sheikha Al-Thani Kicks Off The SATUC Cup, In London



Berlin, April 22, 1956 in a previously unknown tunnel a few feet under Checkpoint Charlie, machine gun fire erupted as Soviet and East German soldiers ambushed Americans in a secret passageway built by the CIA. The border between the hostile powers at the height of Cold War would never be a nice place, but the engineer who built this escape route west was put in danger by a British leak to the Reds.


This was the denouement of the infamous Cambridge Five, a group of treasonous British homosexuals educated at Cambridge; they were Guy Burgess, Anthony Blunt[1], Donald Maclean[2], Kim Philby, and John Cairncross. Burgess, Maclean and Cairncross were detected by 1951, but Kim Philby stayed in the game long enough to expose the tunnel under Checkpoint Charlie, according to a former CIA employee interviewed for this story.

The embarrassing exposure of CIA tunnels under the Iron Curtain went far beyond the border of Germany, besides the obvious casualties underground, renewed exposure by the Cambridge Five was devastating to British Intelligence services, Mi5 and Mi6. Not only had the British intelligence services been totally compromised by Russian spies, it was an embarrassment to Queen and Country (Anthony Blunt was cousin to Queen Elizabeth, and he never faced prosecution), worse, it torched the relationship with the American CIA, whose operation got burned. No longer would Britain occupy such a lofty slot in the intelligence world, that remained only in the movies or simply fiction by Ian Fleming. Like a distrustful lone wolf, CIA now operated alone without the British, the risk was too great that another aristocratic homosexual canary would sing to his communist boyfriends.

stasi02Berlin Checkpoint Charlie 1963

Indeed, much supposition remained for decades over the Fifth Member of the Cambridge Five. Eastward too there were ramifications as the Soviet spy rings in the West were almost all removed, so the now familiar KGB "Judo Strategy" was to use the West's peculiar tastes against them. The West wanted Jews freed? To comply with the trade terms of the Jackson-Vanick Amendment eliminating tariffs on export goods, the Russians allowed a certain number of Jewish emigrants to leave each year, but these weren't the nuclear physicists such as Andrei Sakharov, instead, they emptied their prisons.

Thus the Russian Mafia got its birth in the West. Brighton Beach Brooklyn, here they come. Cuba copied that move when Castro opened up his prisons for the Mariel boatlift of 1980. In retrospect the Communist playbook got predictable, central planning did not allow for creativity even for mischief.


By its very location, East Germany was forced to become a lead player in this Cold War intrigue. The people of the Deutsch Democratic Republic (DDR) chaffed under the Russian boot, which remained an odious presence for decades after the end of the Second World War. Even with barbed wire and a newly constructed Berlin Wall, dozens, if not hundreds of East Germans died each year in the no-mans land between East and West. As such, East German refugees achieved a sainted halo to the west; not only inspiring yet another way for the communists to send in infiltrators to the West, but as a perverse cash source to the hard working but chronically poor East Germany.

Hobbled in its economic efforts by its' thralldom to Moscow, the East Germans did peculiar things to generate extra money. This task fell to their state police, the Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, or just simply “the Stasi,” who often ransomed refugees to their western counterpart, the Federal Republic of Germany, and on the QT the East Germans sold the possessions of formerly wealthy individuals by simply walking in, demanding receipts, and taking what they wanted. Ownership prior to the war was not acceptable, one must show receipts of taxes paid, and if not provided then 90% was carted away.

There may be many who question this perspective or take on Cold War history, regarding this writer's seeming bias against the effectiveness of Mi6 and the very presence of homosexuals in espionage. First of all the story of the Americans getting shot at in the tunnels far beneath Checkpoint Charlie is a confirmed fact. After that happened and especially when Kim Philby left for parts east, the CIA never looked at Mi6 the same after the Cambridge Five was revealed. As a matter of fact, the tunnel used in Operation Gold in Berlin (known as Operation Stopwatch to the British) was constructed under no less the authority of Allen Dulles and Reinhard Gehlen, two of the most formidable names in Cold War espionage. So when a disciple of theirs points the finger at the Cambridge Five, that should be regarded as if those words came from Gehlen and Dulles themselves.


Where did that leave Red Espionage after 1963 when Philbys flight became public? In the long term, the true depth of Soviet infiltration was supplied by the Venona Project, a precursor as it were of the NSA signals monitoring, that broke the Soviet codes. Those messages confirmed Russian spies were treasonous in the USA (David Greenglass, Julius Rosenberg, Ethel Rosenberg, Klaus Fuchs et Theodore Hall) while the decrypted messages also alluded to gay Soviet moles in Mi6. All fact. A legacy of that time period I saw first hand. The CIA applications asked applicants if they were homosexual or travelled to the East Block. I don't have those papers anymore, but I was offered a job with them in April 1985.

Pompous recruiter said, "What would you do for the CIA?"

Alex, "Go deep cover in the Soviet Union and kill communists"

Recruiter, "You are hired!"

I never filled out the application but strangely enough I saw that same CIA guy at a New York club in 1999. I still have his contact information, but he is one cold fish. That life takes its toll, the road not taken, at that very moment a close friend walked out on a grad degree at Yale while I elected not to be a company hit man. The art world's gain.

Back to the intro of why the Stasi came into being, and for all intents and purposes took over for the KGB in Western Europe. This is also confirmed by the now published stories of Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, as when he came west, he too exposed the hidden Soviet moles. Long and short of it was by the mid 1960’s the now totally exposed Soviets didn't decide to behave, they simply subcontracted to the Stasi, who were highly efficient unknowns. Nothing like a killer whose fingerprints are not in the system, the mob calls such foreigners zips because where these guys come from, there are no zip codes. Not only were the Stasi brutally efficient, this “Off the Books,” way of financing themselves through the art and antiques trade showed real elevation of their trade craft as the very best of the east, since their transactions were totally off the radar. No cancelled checks from Moscow! There would be no paper trail. It was the ultimate one off pad. A professional forensic accountant employed by CIA, Mi6 or FBI would have nothing to go on if the payment for treason was in art, say for example a "lost van Gogh" not seen since the waning days of World War Two. Government officials have been sold out for less, and in manners much more readily detectable. We have yet to find out the total extent of the Stasi’s activities under General Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski or his Kunst & Antiquitäten, they are documented as having confiscated some 220,000 objects from innocent East German collectors, and upwards of 10,000 paintings, and of the latter, so far evidence is pointing to them showing up at Christie's (not yet Sotheby's). That trend too, is a disturbing pattern we will delve into as more evidence awaits inspection, and comes to light.


Making news on the front page of the New York Times in late November 2014, is the case in a German court over the legality of ownership regarding the Adriaen Coorte sold at Christie's Amsterdam in 1988 that wound up as the property of the Weldon Family. The Weldon family holds that the works change of ownership was an act of a legal government, obviously Berlin lawyer Ulf Bischof for the Meissner family disagrees, but so too does a former assistant United States Attorney Mark Gaffney, an internationally recognized and respected legal scholar. In answer to our questions on this subject, Mark Gaffney wrote the following:

The USA and the Deutsch Democratic Republic (East Germany) set up a bilateral trade treaty in 1976, but for the entire existence of the DDR from 1949 to 1990, there was minimal trade between the USA and the DDR. It is not illegal under US law for US citizens and US companies to trade with an unrecognized foreign government (the DDR from 1949 to 1974), but they do so at their own risk that the unrecognized foreign government may try to screw them in violation of common commercial norms. The only exception is the Trading with the Enemy Act, making it unlawful for US citizens and US companies to trade with designated hostile nations (designated by the POTUS and the Treasury Department). The DDR was never designated a hostile nation; the Peoples Republic of China and North Korea were designated as hostile nations in 1950, and Cuba in 1962, and The Trading with the Enemy Act was never applied to the USSR or the DDR. Before the trade agreement in 1976, under the Export Control Act, US exports to the DDR (and the USSR) were forbidden without a license from the US Treasury Department, but not imports. Trade between the DDR and the FRG was relatively strong and increasingly so after 1973, because the two Germanies were always deemed one country under FRG law.

On the subject of the legal status under US law of seizures of private property by foreign governments within their sovereign territory, I enclose two articles I wrote for Bloomberg Law in 2008 on the “Act of State Doctrine” and “Foreign Sovereign Immunity”. They discuss cases applying these doctrines to seizures of private property in Russia, Nazi Germany, Cuba, Panama, Nicarauga, etc. - I’m not aware of a US court opinion on Stasi seizures of art objects in the DDR. Today these doctrines would not block recovery in US courts of property stolen by the Stasi, because the DDR no longer exists and the FRG would support such recovery if proof of ownership can be mustered.

Another exception to foreign sovereign immunity applies when a claim is asserted against a foreign sovereign involving taking of property in violation of international law, when that property is located in the U.S. or is exchanged for property located in the U.S.[i] This exception is consistent with the traditional scope of the act of state doctrine, which is a conclusive presumption of the legality of actions of a foreign sovereign, including actions alleged to violate international law, but only actions within its own territory. Thus, U.S. courts traditionally did not entertain claims against a foreign sovereign for compensation for taking of property within the territory of the foreign sovereign.[ii] Congress in 1964 reversed this aspect of the act of state doctrine, and made it inapplicable to foreign governmental seizures of assets of U.S. citizens in violation of principles of international law after January 1, 1959. Section 301 (d)(4) of Foreign Assistance Act of 1964, Pub.L. 88-633, 78 Stat. 1019, 1013, codified at 22 U.S.C. 2370(e)(2).[iii]

[i] 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(3).
[ii] Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964).
[iii] Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1967).

No Sovereign Immunity? This story gets more interesting by the day, forget the fact that seen below are three paintings that have sold at Christie's for upwards of eight million dollars, the more one probes, the numbers and the liability born by whatever auction house took consignments from presumably various Stasi fronts, make this an entirely explosive subject regarding clear title in art. More is surely to come.

Alexander Boyle




stasi09provenancePerhaps those who profited from the Stasi trade, should recall the blood of the innocents



 First published on AAD, 17.01.2015

TWO COTTAGES 1Original work by Gainsborough has a light Source from upper left ?That light on an angle shafts downward to endow the family group in the lower right with a Halo Effect

TWO COTTAGES 2Gainsborough Trees feel the Tug of Gravity, Individual leaves are Backlit Original Oil Painting shows signs of Age and Pigment Shrinkage in the Cracks here, Painting with Leaves & Age vs. Painting without leaves or age

TWO COTTAGES 3Gainsborough Original filled with Dissolved Light in the Atmosphere ?While the Water Shimmers and Leaps

TWO COTTAGES 4The Anatomy of the Figures in the Original reflect decades of Training All Cranial Structures have Skin layered atop Muscle over Bone. All eyes have eyelids, not so the copy

TWO COTTAGES 5Detail of a Gainsborough at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, "Cottage Children" Authentic works show age because they are 230 years old and Endured an equal number of winters replete with the stresses of Modern heating at the Driest time of Year

TWO COTTAGES 6Six Thousand Miles from London, the Huntington sets the standard for Gainsborough

Antique Dealers: 1% of sales revenue, for everything sold which includes Ivory in its manufacture, given to a wildlife fund, and marked on an invoice as such, with a seal, and with a certificate presented (or some kind of paperwork) to that dealer everytime a sale is made, and to show the dealer as having participated in a 'give back' scheme.

Auctioneers: 1% of final hammer price including commissions, for anything which includes Ivory in its manufacture, given to a wildlife fund, and marked on an invoice as such, with a seal and a certificate presented to that auction house.

A voluntary agreement, not mandatory.

What's the win?

* Wildlife funds gets extra funding (Enables further protection for Elephants);

* Dealers / Auctioneers give back to a wildlife protection fund (Something dealers etc. would all take pride in doing, including clients);

* Dealers / Auctioneers get to stay in business;

* Collectors and custodians of art works get to keep their pieces, which hold their value.